NC State Extension Publications

Introduction

Skip to Introduction

Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana) is an Asian species of ornamental pear with more than 20 cultivars planted throughout the Southeast. Popular varieties include Bradford, Chanticleer, Cleveland Select, Autumn Blaze, and Aristocrat. While it was once prized for its spring flowers, oval-shaped canopy, and adaptability to urban environments, it is now evident that Bradford and other varieties of Callery pear exhibit highly invasive traits, such as aggressive proliferation and displacement of native species. Moreover, the tree’s weak branching structure and brittle wood result in frequent breakage, causing post-storm debris and damage to structures, vehicles, and humans. The flowers also emit an unpleasant odor, often described as rotting fish. Callery pear’s invasive nature has drawn growing attention in recent years as the scientific evidence of its invasiveness mounts, states enact legislation to restrict its sale, and grassroots and educational campaigns reach more people.

History of the Bradford Pear and Other Ornamental Varieties in the U.S.

Skip to History of the Bradford Pear and Other Ornamental Varieties in the U.S.

Callery pear was first introduced into the United States in the early 1900s to confer resistance to fire blight (a bacterial disease) in fruit-producing European pear trees (P. communis) (Culley and Hardiman 2007). Soon after, it was discovered that some P. calleryana selections had potential as an ornamental tree and thus, certain varieties were created. The first variety was the Bradford pear (P. calleryana 'Bradford'), developed in the 1950s and prized for its white blossoms in early spring (Figure 1A), bright red foliage in the fall, ability to withstand low-quality soils, and symmetrical oval-shaped canopy (Figure 1B). It is almost entirely pest-free and considered “low maintenance” relative to other horticultural selections. Given its popularity, additional varieties of Callery pear were developed, including Chanticleer, Cleveland Select, Autumn Blaze, and Aristocrat. Because it was the first variety and most widely planted, Bradford pear became a common catch-all name for any of the ornamental varieties. From the 1950s through the 1990s, Callery pears were among the most commonly planted urban trees in the southeastern United States (Figure 2).

Though the trees looked idyllic, many people were quick to notice the pungent odor associated with the flowers, attributed to chemicals emitted to attract pollinators. The smell has been likened to rotting fish and other unsavory odors. Moreover, the tree’s acute branching structure and fast growth lead to weak branch unions. Eventually, the tree can break under its own weight. Mild or moderate storms cause excessive branch and main stem breakage, leaving a mess and, in the worst cases, property damage or personal injury (Figure 3). To make matters worse, within a decade of its introduction, the tree began invading natural areas.

At left, close-up of white flowers on Callery pear tree. Right: A medium-size, symmetrical tree in full bloom with white flowers.

Figure 1. The Bradford pear is a variety of Callery pear that was cultivated, in part, for its showy white flowers (A) that appear in early spring and its symmetrical, oval-shaped canopy (B).

Photos by Kelly Oten, NC State.

Six trees with white blooms planted in a row in a boulevard island.

Figure 2. Bradford and other varieties of Callery pear are often planted in rows and are known for their ability to thrive in a variety of conditions.

A tree fallen over due to a crack at the base. The fallen tree and trees around it have white blooms.

Figure 3. Callery pears are notorious for easily breaking.

Photo by Lauren Gonzalez, NC State.

Wild Callery Pear: The Invasive Offspring

Skip to Wild Callery Pear: The Invasive Offspring

When the Bradford pear was first introduced in the 1950s, it was sterile because it was the lone variety and unable to self-pollinate (Culley and Hardiman 2007). However, as new varieties of Callery pear, like Chanticleer, Cleveland Select, Autumn Blaze, and Aristocrat, were developed and planted, they could cross-pollinate and produce fertile seeds. In addition, Callery pear can sprout new growth from its base; because these trees were developed by combining different rootstock, the sprouts can also cross-pollinate with the flowers on the upper branches. Furthermore, European pear trees (P. communis), the widely planted fruit-producing tree, can also pollinate Callery pear trees.

All varieties of Callery pear can produce viable seed. When birds and other animals eat the fruit and spread the seeds through their droppings, new invasive trees can grow elsewhere. These wild Callery pear trees spread quickly, infiltrating roadsides, agricultural fields, unmanaged lots, urban areas, wetlands, and forests. Such escapes are easy to spot each spring due to their early-blooming white flowers.

Callery pear has had a significant impact on native ecosystems. Its hardiness makes it an adept invader. It has quickly taken over fields and forest edges throughout the eastern United States (Figure 4 and Figure 5). By blooming and producing leaves early in the spring, before most native plants, it shades out and displaces native species. Research indicates that caterpillars prefer Callery pear less than native trees, limiting an essential food source for wildlife like birds (Hartshorn et al. 2022). In addition, Callery pear can form dense thickets, blocking animal movement in wildlife corridors and leaving little to no understory. An understory—made up of smaller trees, shrubs, and plants beneath the canopy—is essential for supporting biodiversity, protecting soil, cycling nutrients, regulating water, and storing carbon.

Wild Callery pear is creating major challenges for land management. Unlike ornamental varieties, the wild offspring have large thorns that can grow up to 4 inches long, which can injure livestock and wildlife (Figure 6). These thorns are even capable of popping tractor tires, posing a hazard to equipment and operators; this is especially problematic on agricultural land and forest plantations, where clearing the land is necessary. To operate safely and efficiently, land managers must either remove Callery pear trees by hand or use costly steel-tracked equipment.

Upper left and right: Pear trees in bloom and post-bloom intermixed with other vegetation on roadsides.

Figure 4. Callery pears are invading various ecosystems, primarily along roadsides and in fields (A, B) but also in forests (C, D).

Photos by Kelly Oten, NC State (A, B), David Coyle, Clemson University (C), and Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, Bugwood.org (D).

Trees with white blooms growing in an area with mixed vegetative growth at the edge of a field

Figure 5. Each spring, Callery pear’s white blooms highlight areas where it has invaded.

Photo by Lauren Gonzalez, NC State.

Close-up of long thorns on a branch, with hand for perspective.

Figure 6. Wild Callery pear have thorns that can grow up to 4 inches long and puncture tractor tires.

Photo by Kelly Oten, NC State.

Identifying Callery Pear

Skip to Identifying Callery Pear

A small to medium-size tree, Callery pear has showy white flowers in early spring and vibrant red or purple leaves in the fall. Leaves are glossy and oval with serrated edges, and fruits are small and hard. The bark is grayish brown and smooth when young but develops fissures as the tree grows. Callery pear cultivars have a uniform, symmetrical, and dense oval-to-pyramidal shape, one of the characteristics that made them desirable as an ornamental (LeGrand et al. 2025). In contrast, wild Callery pears have a more irregular, sprawling form, often with multiple trunks and uneven branching, giving them a less structured and more naturalized appearance. Wild Callery pears form dense thickets and have large thorns on branches and stems.

Other White-Flowering Spring Trees

Other trees that have white flowers in early spring include black cherry (Prunus serotina), chickasaw plum (P. angustifolia), crabapple (Malus spp.), serviceberry (Amelanchier spp.), and flowering dogwood (Benthamidia florida) (Table 1).


Table 1. Spring-Blooming Trees with White Flowers in the Southeastern United States
Species Flower Bloom Timing Bark Leaf
Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana)

Callery Pear Flower Photo

Chuck Bargeron, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

February – April

Callery Pear Bark Photo

Chuck Bargeron, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

Callery Pear Leaf Photo

Michasia Dowdy, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

Flowering dogwood (Benthamidia florida)

Flowering Dogwood Flower Photo

Wendy VanDyk Evans, Bugwood.org

March – April

Flowering Dogwood Bark Photo

Chris Evans, University of Illinois, Bugwood.org

Flowering Dogwood Leaf Photo

John Ruter, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

Chickasaw plum (Prunus angustifolia)

Chickasaw Plum Flower Photo

Chris Evans, University of Illinois, Bugwood.org

March – April

Chickasaw Plum Bark Photo

Karan A. Rawlins, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

Chickasaw Plum Leaf Photo

Karan A. Rawlins, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

Southern crabapple (Malus angustifolia)

Southern Crabapple Flower Photo

John Ruter, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

April – May

Southern Crabapple Bark Photo

John Ruter, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

Southern Crabapple Leaf Photo

Paul Wray, Iowa State University, Bugwood.org

Black cherry (Prunus serotina)

Black Cherry Flower Photo

Paul Wray, Iowa State University, Bugwood.org

April – May

Black Cherry Bark Photo

Chris Evans, University of Illinois, Bugwood.org

Black Cherry Leaf Photo

Chris Evans, University of Illinois, Bugwood.org

Blackhaw viburnum (Viburnum prunifolium)

Blackhaw Viburnum Flower Photo

Dow Gardens, Dow Gardens, Bugwood.org

March – April

Blackhaw Viburnum Bark Photo

Vern Wilkins, Indiana University, Bugwood.org

Blackhaw Viburnum Leaf Photo

Vern Wilkins, Indiana University, Bugwood.org

Downy serviceberry (Amelanchier arborea)

Downy Serviceberry Flower Photo

Paul Wray, Iowa State University, Bugwood.org

March – May

Downy Serviceberry Bark Photo

John Ruter, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

Downy Serviceberry Leaf Photo

Paul Wray, Iowa State University, Bugwood.org

Common pear (Pyrus communis)

Common Pear Flower Photo

George Chernilevsky, Public domain, Wikimedia Commons

April

Common Pear Bark Photo

AnRo0002, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

Common Pear Leaf Photo

Gil Wojciech, Polish Forest Research Institute, Bugwood.org

Oval leaves with fine-toothed edges.

Chickasaw Plum Leaf

Karan A. Rawlins, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

Close-up of a white flower with five rounded petals.

Callery Pear Flower

Chuck Bargeron, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

Tree trunk with vertical fissures in brown bark.

Callery Pear Bark

Chuck Bargeron, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

Glossy, dark green oval leaves with wavy edges.

Callery Pear Leaves

Michasia Dowdy, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

Close-up of small, yellow-green flowers each surrounded by four white bracts.

Flowering Dogwood Flower

Wendy VanDyk Evans, Bugwood.org

Close-up of a tree trunk with rough, scaled bark.

Flowering Dogwood Bark

Chris Evans, University of Illinois, Bugwood.org

Bright-green oval leaves with smooth edges.

Flowering Dogwood Leaves

John Ruter, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

Close-up of small white flowers with yellow centers.

Chickasaw Plum Flower

Chris Evans, University of Illinois, Bugwood.org

Close-up of small white flowers with yellow centers.

Chickasaw Plum Bark

Chris Evans, University of Illinois, Bugwood.org

Dark-green, glossy oblong leaves with smooth edges.

Common Pear Leaf

Gil Wojciech, Polish Forest Research Institute, Bugwood.org

Close-up of a flower with five white to light-pink petals.

Southern Crabapple Flower

John Ruter, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

Tree trunk with with dark, finely-fissured bark.

Southern Crabapple Bark

John Ruter, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

Elongated oval, glossy leaves with finely-toothed edges.

Southern Crabapple Leaf

Paul Wray, Iowa State University, Bugwood.org

An elongated cluster of white flowers.

Black Cherry Flower

Paul Wray, Iowa State University, Bugwood.org

Tree trunk with gray, roughly-scaled bark.

Black Cherry Bark

Chris Evans, University of Illinois, Bugwood.org

Medium-green oval leaves with finely-toothed edges.

Black Cherry Leaf

Chris Evans, University of Illinois, Bugwood.org

A large, dense cluster of small white flowers with closely-spaced petals.

Blackhaw Viburnum Flower

Dow Gardens, Dow Gardens, Bugwood.org

Tree trunk with dark brown textured bark.

Blackhaw Viburnum Bark

Vern Wilkins, Indiana University, Bugwood.org

Bright-green, oval leaves with finely-toothed edges.

Blackhaw Viburnum Leaf

Vern Wilkins, Indiana University, Bugwood.org

Close-up of flowers with thin, elongated, widely-spaced white petals.

Downy Serviceberry Flower

Paul Wray, Iowa State University, Bugwood.org

Tree trunk with light-gray, smooth, finely-fissured bark.

Downy Serviceberry Bark

John Ruter, University of Georgia, Bugwood.org

Bright-green, elongated, heart-shaped leaves with finely-toothed edges.

Downy Serviceberry Leaf

Paul Wray, Iowa State University, Bugwood.org

Close-up of flowers with white petals and yellow centers.

Common Pear Flower

George Chernilevsky, Public domain, Wikimedia Commons

Tree trunk with rough, brown, bark.

Common Pear Bark

AnRo0002, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons

Regulations Preventing the Sale and Plantings of Pyrus calleryana

Skip to Regulations Preventing the Sale and Plantings of Pyrus calleryana

Given the invasive tendency of Callery pears and their negative impacts on native ecosystems, several U.S. states have banned or restricted the sale and planting of the Callery pear. From 2021 to 2024, Ohio, South Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Kansas enacted bans. Localities and municipalities in some states have also implemented bans or restrictions.

Public Awareness and "Bradford Pear Bounties"

Skip to Public Awareness and "Bradford Pear Bounties"

Coinciding with legislative actions to prohibit the sale and planting of Callery pear, public awareness of its invasive nature continues to grow. This shift is reflected in expanding media coverage at both local and national levels. In the early 2020s, major pieces in The New York Times, The Washington Post, and USA Today highlighted the issue.

The rising popularity of native plant landscaping and “plant no harm” initiatives has further influenced public perception, reframing invasive species as not just a horticultural concern but a broader environmental responsibility tied to biodiversity conservation. As sustainable gardening and landscaping practices gain traction, support for removing Callery pear has steadily increased.

In response, several states—including North Carolina, South Carolina, Kentucky, and Indiana—have implemented tree replacement programs that incentivize the removal of Callery pears. These initiatives, often referred to as "bounty" programs, typically offer homeowners free native trees in exchange for cutting down Callery pears. The NC Bradford Pear Bounty (Figure 7), a cooperative effort of NC State Extension, North Carolina Urban Forest Council, North Carolina Wildlife Federation, and North Carolina Forest Service, was launched in 2022. Hosted in different locations around the state, the program offers up to five free native trees in exchange for the removal of Callery pears.

Top left: A line of cars with people with clipboards at each car. Bottom left: Close-up of volunteer at car window. Top/bottom right: People loading replacement potted trees.

Figure 7. Participants in the NC Bradford Pear Bounty pick up complementary native trees in exchange for proof of Callery pear removal on their property.

Photos by Shea Phillips and Kelly Oten, NC State.

What Should You Do with Your Callery Pears?

Skip to What Should You Do with Your Callery Pears?

Landowners with Callery pears on their property are encouraged to remove them and replace them with native trees to reduce continued spread and negative impacts. Fortunately, there are many beneficial trees native to North Carolina that have similar aesthetic value as Callery pear and its many varieties. Examples include flowering dogwood (Benthamidia florida), eastern redbud (Cercis canadensis), serviceberry (Amelanchier spp.), black cherry (Prunus serotina), or Chickasaw plum (Prunus angustifolia).

Removing Callery pear is different in urban areas than in wild landscapes. In urban settings, removal typically involves cutting down the tree and grinding the stump to prevent regrowth. However, because Callery pear can resprout from the roots, applying a targeted herbicide to the freshly cut stump is often necessary for complete eradication. In contrast, controlling wild Callery pear in fields and forest edges is more challenging due to its aggressive spread. Mechanical removal, such as by cutting or bulldozing, may be used, but without follow-up herbicide treatment, new shoots will quickly emerge. The most effective approach in these areas involves a combination of cutting the trees and applying systemic herbicides to stumps and surrounding foliage to prevent regrowth. Regular monitoring and repeated treatments may be necessary to fully eliminate infestations in natural landscapes. Table 2 provides a description of different management methods.

Removal

Wild Callery pear removal can be difficult due to its large thorns and dense growth habits. Smaller plants may be removed by hand, but roots must be removed to prevent resprouting. It is strongly recommended to treat stumps with an appropriate herbicide (for example, glyphosate or triclopyr) after cutting to prevent resprouting. In urban areas, landowners are encouraged to contact a Certified Tree Arborist to ensure safe and effective removal.

Herbicide Application

Many herbicides are recommended to control Callery pear, but only a few are supported by research. For foliar applications, glyphosate (for example, Roundup) and imazapyr consistently provide control (Vogt et al. 2020). Triclopyr (for example, Forestry Garlon XRT) and triclopyr + aminopyralid (for example, Milestone) are effective as basal bark applications, when mixed with a basal oil (Vogt et al. 2020). The hack-and-squirt method is an effective, cost-efficient approach for controlling larger trees, as it delivers herbicide directly into the tree’s vascular system; further, this method minimizes off-target impacts because there is limited contact by herbicides with nearby plants. The hack-and-squirt method involves making incisions (hacks) through the bark and then applying a measured dose of herbicide into each cut. Typically, one hack per 3 inches of trunk diameter is sufficient. According to Russell (2023), best results for hack-and-squirt are exhibited when conducted in the fall and with application rates of 0.5 ml or 1 ml per incision of imazapyr (for example, Polaris AC Complete) or potassium salt of aminocyclopyrachlor (for example, Method 240SL). Note that all of the previous methods will ultimately leave a standing dead tree, which could be a hazard that may require removal. The cut-stump method is highly preferred for larger specimens, as it removes the tree entirely; cut the tree at its base and immediately apply concentrated glyphosate or triclopyr directly to the freshly cut stump. For large trees, herbicide application can be limited to the stump's circumference, as it only needs to penetrate the vascular tissues to be effective (Figure 8). If herbicide is not applied within 5 to 10 minutes, it may not be able to penetrate, and the stump must be recut for the herbicide to be effective.

It is essential to follow all pesticide label instructions, as they are legally binding and enforceable by law.


Table 2. Management Methods for Callery Pear
Eradication Method Description Best For Considerations
Hand Pulling Uproot small, young seedlings manually when the soil is moist to ensure complete root removal.

Light infestations; seedlings

Effective only for very young plants; incomplete root removal can lead to resprouting.

Mechanical Removal Cut the tree close to the ground, then immediately remove the root system to prevent resprouting.

Mature trees

Labor-intensive; may require heavy equipment; incomplete root removal can result in regrowth.

Cut-Stump Treatment Cut the tree close to the ground and promptly apply a systemic herbicide such as glyphosate or triclopyr to the stump within 5 to 10 minutes to prevent resprouting.

Trees of various sizes

Herbicide application should occur immediately after cutting for maximum effectiveness; suitable for year-round application.

Basal Bark Application Apply an oil-soluble herbicide mixture to the lower 12 to 18 inches of the tree's trunk without cutting, allowing the chemical to penetrate and kill the tree.

Trees less than 6 inches in diameter

Effective during dormant seasons; be sure to completely cover the trunk's circumference.

Foliar Application Spray the leaves with a systemic herbicide solution during the growing season to kill the tree.

Dense thickets or areas with numerous small trees

Best applied in mid- to late summer; note that nonselective herbicides may damage surrounding vegetation.

Hack-and-Squirt Make downward-angled cuts into the trunk (one hack per 3 inches) and spray herbicide into each cut, allowing the tree to absorb the chemical and die gradually.

Larger trees (over 6 inches in diameter)

Minimizes disturbance to surrounding area; requires careful application to ensure effectiveness.

Monitoring

Callery pear trees are notorious for resprouting; therefore, monitor treated areas regularly for signs of regrowth and reapply treatments if necessary. Always follow local guidelines and regulations when using herbicides and consider consulting with a professional for large-scale infestations or if you are uncertain about the appropriate method.

A tree stump cut close to the ground with a green-dyed herbicide visible around its circumference.

Figure 8. This cut stump was treated with green-dyed herbicide to ensure coverage of the vascular tissues located beneath the tree bark.

Photo by Kelly Oten, NC State.

Conclusion

Skip to Conclusion

Callery pear may have started as a popular ornamental tree, but its invasive nature has become a serious problem for native ecosystems. It is encouraging that more people are becoming aware of harm posed by the Callery pear, with efforts to remove and replace these trees gaining momentum. By choosing native alternatives and supporting removal programs, we can all do our part to protect our land, wildlife, and forests.

Acknowledgments

Skip to Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by the Extension Capacity Fund (Smith-Lever 3[b] and 3[c], Project Award No. 7007438), from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA NIFA), and by the Renewable Resources Extension Act (RREA), Project Award No. 7009029, from USDA NIFA. Funding for this project was also provided through a USDA Forest Service Urban and Community Forestry Grant from the North Carolina Forest Service, N.C. Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services (NCDA&CS), and the USDA Forest Service. NCDA&CS is an equal opportunity employer.

We also thank the anonymous reviewers who provided comments that improved the quality of this fact sheet.

References

Skip to References

Culley, T. M., and N. A. Hardiman. 2007. "The Beginning of a New Invasive Plant: A History of the Ornamental Callery Pear in the United States." BioScience 57 (11): 956–964.

Hartshorn, J. A., J. F. Palmer, and D. R. Coyle. 2022. "Into the Wild: Evidence for the Enemy Release Hypothesis in the Invasive Callery Pear (Pyrus calleryana) (Rosales: Rosaceae)." Environmental Entomology 51 (1): 216–221.

LeGrand, H., B. Sorrie, and T. Howard. 2025. Vascular Plants of North Carolina [website]. North Carolina Biodiversity Project and North Carolina State Parks.

Russell, D. 2023. Hack and Squirt for Chinese Tallow and Callery Pear Control. PowerPoint Presentation. Auburn University College of Agriculture and Mississippi State University Department of Plant and Soil Sciences.

Vogt, J. T., D. R. Coyle, D. Jenkins, C. Barnes, C. Crowe, S. Horn, C. Bates, and F. A. Roesch. 2020. "Efficacy of Five Herbicide Treatments for Control of Pyrus calleryana." Invasive Plant Science and Management 13 (4): 252–257.

Authors

Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist, Forest Health
Forestry & Environmental Resources
Graduate Research and Extension Assistant
Forestry & Environmental Resources

Find more information at the following NC State Extension websites:

Publication date: July 10, 2025
AG-986

N.C. Cooperative Extension prohibits discrimination and harassment regardless of age, color, disability, family and marital status, gender identity, national origin, political beliefs, race, religion, sex (including pregnancy), sexual orientation and veteran status.