NC State Extension Publications

Introduction

Consistent weed control and nitrogen availability are important factors in determining yield in organic no-till corn production. Utilizing cover crop mulches for weed control can reduce organic producers’ dependency on cultivation, thereby reducing weed control failure due to unfavorable weather. Planting a cover crop mixture of cereal and legumes can provide the dual benefits of weed suppression and fertility provision. Depending on nitrogen carryover from previous management, additional fertilizer may be required beyond that provided through cover crop mineralization to maximize corn yield. This publication discusses cover crop management and starter fertilizer considerations for producers interested in organic no-till corn production.

How Can I Manage My Cover Crop to Make this System Work?

Cover crops can be terminated with a roller-crimper, creating a weed suppressive mulch. A cover crop can suppresses weeds by reducing light availability to weeds and by releasing allelochemicals (which inhibit the growth of other plants) during cover crop residue decomposition. High cover crop biomass production is the key to achieving season-long weed suppression from a cover crop mulch. Cereal cover crops can achieve high biomass production but have limited value for early-season nitrogen release, while legume cover crops can provide substantial nitrogen release but often do not provide season-long weed control. Using a cereal and legume cover crop mixture can simultaneously provide nitrogen and suppress weeds. Early fall cover crop establishment into a conventionally tilled seedbed using a grain drill can aid in achieving high cover crop biomass.

Two years of research at the Sustainable Agricultural Systems Lab (Beltsville, MD), North Carolina State University (Kinston and Salisbury, NC), and the Rodale Institute (Kutztown, PA) resulted in high cover crop biomass production from a mixture of cereal rye (90 pounds per acre) and hairy vetch (12 pounds per acre) seeded early using a small grain drill (Table 1; Figure 1). Cover crop seeding would cost approximately $60 per acre. The nitrogen content of the cover crop ranged from 85 to173 pounds per acre across the sites (Table 2). Cereal rye dominated cover crop biomass in the mixture at all sites (Table 2). Hairy vetch contributed more to overall cover crop biomass in the Kinston environments, which had low nitrogen carryover from previous management (Table 2). Cover crop termination was targeted for soft-dough stage for the cereal rye and 100 percent flowering for the hairy vetch. At several sites we experienced good success planting corn into a cover crop that was terminated one to three weeks before planting. This may be attributed to cleaner slicing through the cover crop mulch by the planter due to dry down of the cover crop between termination and corn planting. Soil moisture can also be replenished when planting is delayed following cover crop termination. Recommendations differ about when to terminate cover crops via roller-crimping, and successes have occurred with terminating the cover crop both before planting and at planting. Extensive cover crop regrowth between the first and second cover crop roller-crimping events was not observed in most sites. At the Kinston 2013 site, we did observe some cover crop regrowth and a second roller-crimping event occurred at corn spiking.

Excellent weed suppression was observed in six of the seven sites (Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4). Weed suppression was compromised at the Kinston 2013 site where only 5,649 pounds of cover crop biomass per acre was achieved (Table 2). The Kinston 2013 site had low nitrogen carryover from previous management, and this restricted cereal rye growth. The result was less overall cover crop biomass, which compromised the ability of the cover crop mulch to suppress weeds.


Table 1. Cover crop management and corn planting for each site.
Site Cover Crop Planting Roller-Crimping 1 Roller Crimping 2 Corn Planting
Beltsville 2013 9/15/2012 5/31/2013 6/21/2013 6/21/2013
Beltsville 2014 9/27/2013 6/5/2014 6/19/2014 6/19/2014
Kinston 2013 10/11/2012 5/8/2013 5/16/2013 5/8/2013
Kinston 2014 9/27/2013 5/12/2014 5/20/2014 5/29/2014
Kutztown 2014 9/13/2013 6/6/2014 None 6/6/2014
Salisbury 2013 9/27/2012 5/15/2013 5/28/2013 5/29/2013
Salisbury 2014 9/18/2013 5/14/2014 5/22/2014 5/22/2014


Table 2. Cover crop biomass and N content.
Site Cereal Rye Biomass (lb/acre) Hairy Vetch Biomass (lb/acre) Total Cover Crop Biomass (lb/acre) Cover Crop N Content (lb/acre)
Beltsville 2013 12,673 1,108 13,781 158
Beltsville 2014 4,807 1,871 6,678 85
Kinston 2013 5,649* 108
Kinston 2014 5,354 3,244 8,598 164
Kutztown 2014 10,428 1,926 12,354 173
Salisbury 2013 8,720* 132
Salisbury 2014 6,983 2,062 9,045 150
* Note: Cover crop biomass was not separated by species at the Kinston 2013 and Salisbury 2013 sites.

Figure 1. Roller-crimping a cereal rye and hairy vetch

Figure 1. Roller-crimping a cereal rye (90 pounds per acre) and hairy vetch (12 pounds per acre) cover crop mixture one week before corn planting.

Figure 2. Cover crop mulch suppressing weeds at corn black layer

Figure 2. Cover crop mulch suppressing weeds at corn black layer at the Salisbury 2013 site.

Figure 3. Cover crop mulch suppressing weeds at corn black layer

Figure 3. Cover crop mulch suppressing weeds at corn black layer at the Salisbury 2014 site.

Figure 4. Cover crop mulch suppressing weeds at corn black layer

Figure 4. Cover crop mulch suppressing weeds at corn black layer at the Kinston 2014 site.

How Can I Achieve a Respectable Corn Stand with this System?

Planting into heavy cover crop biomass can be a challenge for some organic producers. The lead researchers in this project have been continuously modifying no-till planters to create a planter design that will plant reliably and efficiently into heavy cover crop biomass. Current planter modifications include both heavy-residue slicers and Yetter residue managers (Yetter Profitable Solutions, Colchester, IL) mounted to an added front toolbar (Figure 5). When planting conditions do not allow for a clean slice in the cover crop residue, the residue must be moved from the crop row with the Yetter residue managers to ensure good seed-to-soil contact (Figure 6). When planting conditions permit, the Yetter residue managers can be raised, allowing for minimal movement of the cover crop residue from the crop row. This minimizes in-row weed pressure (Figure 7). If possible, producers should have a flexible planter design that can provide options for cover crop residue movement depending on planting conditions. Perfect stands were not achieved across these sites; however, stands were better than achieved with previous research in this system.

Fig 5. No-till planter design used for planting into heavy cover

Figure 5. No-till planter design used for planting into heavy cover crop biomass. Yetter residue managers and heavy residue slicers are mounted on an added front toolbar.

Figure 6. Planting into a cover crop mulch when the Yetter resid

Figure 6. Planting into a cover crop mulch when the Yetter residue managers were engaged.

Figure 7. Planting into a cover crop mulch when the Yetter resid

Figure 7. Planting into a cover crop mulch when the Yetter residue managers were raised.

When Is It Necessary to Use Starter Fertilizer in Addition to Nitrogen Release from the Cover Crop?

To maximize corn yield, additional fertilizer may be required beyond that provided through cover crop mineralization. Topdressing poultry litter, also known as surface broadcasting, is a popular fertility management strategy for organic corn producers in the Southeast because it is convenient and relatively inexpensive. If topdress poultry litter applications continue to become more regulated due to environmental concerns, producers may be limited to using other organic fertilizer sources and application techniques. Many organic producers still have dry fertilizer hoppers on their planters, and these dry fertilizer hoppers can be utilized to provide starter fertilizer. Loose litter does not flow well from the dry fertilizer hoppers, but pelleted material works well. Organic producers can choose from several pelleted organic fertilizer materials that vary in nitrogen content and price.

This research study evaluated: topdressing different rates of poultry litter, subsurface banding organically certified pelleted materials, and applying no additional fertility beyond that provided through cover crop mineralization (Table 3). All starter fertility treatments were evaluated across the same cover crop mixture of cereal rye (90 pounds per acre) and hairy vetch (12 pounds per acre). The subsurface starter fertilizer treatments were applied via a John Deere 7200 planter equipped with dry fertilizer hoppers that delivered a subsurface band of fertilizer (Figure 8). Pelleted fertilizers were used for the subsurface banded treatments. Setting the dry fertilizer hoppers for maximum fertilizer delivery allowed pelleted fertilizer to be delivered at 575 to 625 pounds per acre. Keep in mind when using pelleted fertilizer materials that hopper openings can still plug up if the hoppers have tapered output tubes.

At the Beltsville 2013, Beltsville 2014, Kinston 2014, Salisbury 2013, and Salisbury 2014 sites, corn yield was greatest with the high-rate topdress poultry litter treatment, and was reduced with the low-rate topdress poultry litter treatment and the subsurface feather meal treatment (Figure 9). Corn yield was lowest and similar between the subsurface poultry litter and no added fertility treatments at these sites (Figure 9). Feather meal is an expensive fertilizer source, but did provide yield increases at these five sites compared with adding no fertility. For those producers on a site with moderate nitrogen carryover from previous management and limitations on topdress poultry litter use, subsurface banding feather meal is a viable option for increasing corn grain yield, but the economics of using feather meal may be limiting.

The Kinston 2013 site had low nitrogen carryover from previous management, which was reflected in the lower cover crop biomass achieved at this environment (Table 2). Corn yield was greatest with the topdress poultry litter treatment, and corn yield was not affected by the presence or absence of weeds within this treatment (Figure 10). This is likely attributed to high nitrogen provision enhancing the corn’s competitiveness with weeds. In the subsurface and no added fertility treatments at this site, the corn crop was not competitive with weeds, and heavy weed pressure in these treatments adversely affected corn yield (Figure 10). At this site, corn yield did increase with the subsurface poultry litter treatment, which only provided 17 to 19 pounds of nitrogen per acre (Figure 10). Nitrogen typically releases more rapidly from poultry litter than from feather meal. The corn yield increase observed with the pelleted poultry litter treatment compared to the no added fertility treatment can likely be attributed to enhanced corn competitiveness early in the season from rapid nutrient release from the poultry litter. If a producer is on a site with low nitrogen carryover, it is critical to provide adequate nitrogen through starter fertilizer applications to ensure crop competitiveness with weeds and high corn grain yield.

At the Kutztown 2014 site, corn grain yield was similar among all starter fertility treatments. This study site has a long history of legume and manure use and therefore high nitrogen carryover from previous management. Results from this site indicate that it may not be necessary to apply additional fertility to sites with high nitrogen carryover from a long history of manure and legume use, beyond that provided through cover crop mineralization, to maximize corn yield. Additional research on sites with high nitrogen carryover is necessary to confirm results observed at this study site.


Table 3. Starter fertility treatments.
Fertility Treatment Rate N Applied (lb/acre) Cost ($/acre)
Topdress Poultry Litter 4 T/A 240 120
Topdress Poultry Litter 2 T/A 120 60
Subsurface Feather Meal* 575–625 lb/acre 75–82 280–305
Subsurface Pelleted Poultry Litter** 575–625 lb/acre 17–19 57–63
No Added Fertility
* Feather meal source was NatureSafe Blending Base (13-0-0).
** Pelleted poultry litter (3-2-3) was obtained from Perdue AgriRecycle, LLC.
Notes: The same cover crop mixture was planted across all fertility treatments. The 2 T/A topdress poultry litter treatment was not tested at the Kinston 2013 site.

Fig 8. Dry fertilizer hoppers were utilized to deliver a subsurf

Figure 8. Dry fertilizer hoppers were utilized to deliver a subsurface band of pelleted poultry litter and feather meal.

Figure 9. Corn yield averaged across five sites as affected by s

Figure 9. Corn yield averaged across five sites as affected by starter fertility treatment.

Figure 10. Corn yield as affected by starter fertility treatment

Figure 10. Corn yield as affected by starter fertility treatment at a site with low nitrogen carryover.

Summary

  1. The cereal rye (90 pounds per acre) and hairy vetch (12 pounds per acre) cover crop mixture evaluated in this study had high biomass production potential and subsequently provided excellent weed control in six of the seven study sites.
  2. Starter fertilizer applications were necessary to maximize corn yield at six of the seven study sites.
  3. At five of the seven study sites, corn yield increases were observed with the subsurface feather meal treatment compared to adding no fertility. This indicates that subsurface feather meal applications may be a viable option to increase corn grain yield for producers limited in their ability to make topdress poultry litter applications. However, the expense of feather meal may be a limitation for producers.
  4. At our site with low nitrogen carryover from previous management, cover crop biomass production was reduced and a topdress poultry litter application was necessary to ensure the corn’s competitiveness with weeds and to maximize corn yield.

NCSU CALS logo

Rodale logo

USDA-ARS logo

Authors:

Graduate Research Assistant
Crop and Soil Sciences
Associate Professor
Crop and Soil Sciences
Graduate Student, Sustainable Agriculture
Iowa State University
Research Ecologist, Sustainable Agriculture Systems Laboratory
USDA-ARS
Associate Research Scientist
Rodale Institute
Executive Director
Rodale Institute

Publication date: June 1, 2016
AG-822

The use of brand names in this publication does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service of the products or services named nor discrimination against similar products or services not mentioned.

North Carolina State University and North Carolina A&T State University commit themselves to positive action to secure equal opportunity regardless of race, color, creed, national origin, religion, sex, age, veteran status or disability. In addition, the two Universities welcome all persons without regard to sexual orientation.